<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nanothoughts.net &#187; nfl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nanothoughts.net/category/nfl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nanothoughts.net</link>
	<description>nanothoughts for electric headz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 02:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blog roundup March 12th 2007, Chimps, Megamachines, Art, Hats, and Drafts</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/03/12/blog-roundup-march-12th-2007-chimps-megamachines-art-hats-and-drafts/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/03/12/blog-roundup-march-12th-2007-chimps-megamachines-art-hats-and-drafts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craziness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megamachine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some random blogs I&#8217;ve been perusing:The Dark Lodger opines about the Senegalese Chimp Emerging Market for High Tech Industry Seve Jobs of Apple has announced the new 40gb istick to be released to the chimp market next week. Not be &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2007/03/12/blog-roundup-march-12th-2007-chimps-megamachines-art-hats-and-drafts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some random blogs I&#8217;ve been perusing:<br /><a href="http://darklodge.blogspot.com/2007/02/senegalese-chimp-emerging-market-for.html">The Dark Lodger opines about the Senegalese Chimp Emerging Market for High Tech Industry</a><br />
<blockquote>Seve Jobs of Apple has announced the new 40gb istick to be released to the chimp market next week. Not be outdone in the news, MicroSoft has released a statement that win-stick 2.0 has a security update and all older win-sticks versions must be rebooted prior to &#8220;power jabbing.&#8221; Wii has also announced a verson of the wireless wii-stick. The barkless version is still in beta testing due to unintentional release.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://megamachine.wordpress.com/">Notes From the Megamachine has been resurrected at WordPress</a> (<a href="http://megamachine.blogspot.com/">formerly at Blogger</a>) Will the technate be constructed in the 07? Tune in to find out!</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://confidenceartist.blogspot.com/2007/02/selection-sunday-ermonday-rather.html">The Confidence Artist weighs in with his 65 artist field</a></p></blockquote>
<p>. No Michelangelo? For shame!<br />Be sure to check out his <a href="http://confidenceartist.blogspot.com/2007/02/stupid-hat-roundup.html">STOOPID HAT ROUNDUP. YEAH, BABY</a>! Micky Free is not a girl, aight?!</p>
<p>And last, but not adsensely least:<br /><a href="http://www.warroomreport.com/blog/">reports on the NFL combine and NFL draft</a></p>
<p>Rokk on have a great Ides of March!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/03/12/blog-roundup-march-12th-2007-chimps-megamachines-art-hats-and-drafts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norv Turner is overrated</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/02/19/norv-turner-is-overrated/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/02/19/norv-turner-is-overrated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norv turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shaved head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Chargers win the Superbowl in 2008 (and he is the head coach on the sidelines), I will shave my head just like Britney. I promise. Now, how many of my loyal readers will pay to see that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Chargers win the Superbowl in 2008 (and he is the head coach on the sidelines), I will shave my head just like Britney. I promise.</p>
<p>Now, how many of my loyal readers will pay to see that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/02/19/norv-turner-is-overrated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday roundup</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/02/10/saturday-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/02/10/saturday-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[boing boing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drawings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The War Room Report goes live:NFL, College Football, and Mock Draft Source! The Dark-ful Lodger has problems with a package Nice collection of Boingboing.net Stats Indexed has a bunch of funny drawings on index cards And, Voronya Cave is the &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2007/02/10/saturday-roundup/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The War Room Report goes live:<br /><a href="http://www.warroomreport.com/">NFL, College Football, and Mock Draft Source!</a></p>
<p><a href="http://darklodge.blogspot.com/2007/02/case-of-misplaced-package-ups-sucks.html">The Dark-ful Lodger has problems with a package</a></p>
<p>Nice collection of <a href="http://waxy.org/projects/boingboingstats/">Boingboing.net Stats</a></p>
<p><a href="http://indexed.blogspot.com/">Indexed has a bunch of funny drawings on index cards</a></p>
<p>And, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voronya_Cave">Voronya Cave is the deepest cave in the world.</a> And makes for some <a href="http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0505/feature4/multimedia.html"> very wild spelunking</a>.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a random picture for fun: <br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_q3sLpPRYGX0/Rc5B8Ghm0lI/AAAAAAAAAAc/QGQVcG_ndkE/s1600-h/random2.JPG"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_q3sLpPRYGX0/Rc5B8Ghm0lI/AAAAAAAAAAc/QGQVcG_ndkE/s200/random2.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5030030334618948178" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/02/10/saturday-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 NFL Conference Championship predictions</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/21/2007-nfl-conference-championship-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/21/2007-nfl-conference-championship-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Orleans at Chicago +3-120 -3+10043 ov-110 New Orleans over Da Bears, 31-27 New England at Indianapolis +3+105 -3-12547.5 ov-110 Colts over the Pats, 24-17]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www2.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=7554831"> </a>       <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/nor">New Orleans</a><br />       at       <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/chi">Chicago</a>          +3-120 <br />-3+100<br />43 ov-110</p>
<p>New Orleans over <a href="http://snltranscripts.jt.org/90/90jsuperfans.phtml">Da Bears</a><br />, 31-27</p>
<p><a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/nwe">New England</a><br />       at       <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/ind">Indianapolis</a>          +3+105 <br />-3-125<br />47.5 ov-110</p>
<p>Colts over the Pats, 24-17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/21/2007-nfl-conference-championship-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Divisional Round Playoff Predictions continued</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/14/nfl-divisional-round-playoff-predictions-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/14/nfl-divisional-round-playoff-predictions-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My predictions yesterday were 3 for 4 in terms of spread an O/U, you know, what counts. Let&#8217;s see how I do today. 1:00 pm Seattle at Chicago -9.5O/U 37 Chicago wins by 3 on a last minute FG by &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/14/nfl-divisional-round-playoff-predictions-continued/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://nanothoughts.blogspot.com/2007/01/nfl-playoff-predictions.html">predictions yesterday</a> were 3 for 4 in terms of spread an O/U, you know, what counts. Let&#8217;s see how I do today.</p>
<p>1:00 pm     Seattle at Chicago -9.5<br />O/U 37</p>
<p>Chicago wins by 3 on a last minute FG by Robbie Gould, <span style="font-weight:bold;">17-16, Da Bears</span>!</p>
<p>4:30 pm     New England at San Diego -4.5<br />O/U 46</p>
<p>LT scores 2 TDs and a two point conversion. <span style="font-weight:bold;">San Diego</span> lights up the Pats, <span style="font-weight:bold;">31-21</span>.</p>
<p>Tags:<br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NFL" rel="tag">NFL</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Seahawks" rel="tag">Seahawks</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bears" rel="tag">Bears</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Patriots" rel="tag">Patriots</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chargers" rel="tag">Chargers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/14/nfl-divisional-round-playoff-predictions-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Playoff Predictions</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/13/nfl-playoff-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/13/nfl-playoff-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4:30 pm Indianapolis at Baltimore -4O/U 42 Ravens intercept Manning at least twice and Baltimore gets to fly to San Diego next week, 24-17. 8:00 pm Philadelphia at New Orleans -5.5O/U 48.5 This is a tough one. I&#8217;d like Philly &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/13/nfl-playoff-predictions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4:30 pm Indianapolis at Baltimore -4<br />O/U 42</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Ravens</span> intercept Manning at least twice and Baltimore gets to fly to San Diego next   week, <span style="font-weight:bold;">24-17</span>.</p>
<p>8:00 pm Philadelphia at New Orleans -5.5<br />O/U 48.5</p>
<p>This is a tough one. I&#8217;d like Philly to win, but I think the <span style="font-weight:bold;">Saints</span> will win in a nailbiting shootout, <span style="font-weight:bold;">34-31</span>.</p>
<p>Tags:<br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NFL" rel="tag">NFL</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ravens" rel="tag">Ravens</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Colts" rel="tag">Colts</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Saints" rel="tag">Saints</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Eagles" rel="tag">Eagles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/13/nfl-playoff-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Perfect Gift For Any Dallas Cowboys Fan</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/11/the-perfect-gift-for-any-dallas-cowboys-fan/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/11/the-perfect-gift-for-any-dallas-cowboys-fan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this Tony Romo action figure on ebay. Available while supplies last! Hats off to the designer of that, but I&#8217;d hardly spend $210 on it. Tags:Dallas Cowboys ebay Tony Romo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/DALLAS-TONY-ROMO-CUSTOM-MCFARLANE-NFL-PLAYOFFS-JERSEY_W0QQitemZ170068363064QQihZ007QQcategoryZ48978QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem">Tony Romo action figure</a> on ebay. Available while supplies last! Hats off to the designer of that, but I&#8217;d hardly spend $210 on it.</p>
<p>Tags:<br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Dallas" rel="tag">Dallas</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Cowboys" rel="tag">Cowboys</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ebay" rel="tag">ebay</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Tony" rel="tag">Tony</a> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Romo" rel="tag">Romo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2007/01/11/the-perfect-gift-for-any-dallas-cowboys-fan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Parcells, Mike Vanderjagt, and Dr. Livingstone&#8217;s frozen elixir</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2006/12/01/bill-parcells-mike-vanderjagt-and-dr-livingstones-frozen-elixir/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2006/12/01/bill-parcells-mike-vanderjagt-and-dr-livingstones-frozen-elixir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a bit out of date, as he&#8217;s been released, but for the sake of completeness I&#8217;ll post what I&#8217;ve found. from an ESPN posted AP article: Asked last week about getting Vanderjagt out of his rut,Parcells said: &#8220;I &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2006/12/01/bill-parcells-mike-vanderjagt-and-dr-livingstones-frozen-elixir/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit out of date, as he&#8217;s been released, but for the sake of completeness I&#8217;ll post what I&#8217;ve found.</p>
<p>from an <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=nfl&#038;id=2677866">ESPN posted AP article</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Asked last week about getting Vanderjagt out of his rut,<br />Parcells said: &#8220;I don&#8217;t have a Dr. Livingstone&#8217;s frozen elixir. I<br />don&#8217;t. I don&#8217;t know what I can do. This guy is 36 years old and has<br />been kicking for a long time. He has his way of doing things.<br />Hopefully, things get a little bit better.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This led to some speculation as to what Dr. Livingstone&#8217;s frozen elixir is/was.</p>
<p>First of all, I&#8217;m always wary of AP articles. They often misquote people.<br />e.g. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15879800/">Another AP article which obviously misquotes Parcells</a>.<br />
<blockquote>Parcells said. “There are things that happen out there that people aren’t cognitive of.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Clearly he said (or meant) &#8220;cognizant&#8221; instead of cognitive. Even if he did misspeak, the writer could&#8217;ve fixed it with bracketed notation.</p>
<p>Anyway, so maybe he did says Livingstone&#8217;s frozen elixir. What he was most likely referring to was Chartreuse Liquer (Elixir), which is not frozen:<br /><a href="http://www.chartreuse.fr/pa_history3_uk.htm">History of the Chartreuse Liqueurs</a></p>
<p>And as <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/jazz/louxsie/green.html">this page</a> points out:<br />
<blockquote>Its reputation as a medicine was augmented even as late as the 19th century when it was widely used as a treatment in the cholera epidemic that swept Paris in 1832. It is even reputed that the explorer Livingstone took the drink into Africa as a solution to the many diseases rife in the jungles.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, the <a href="http://www.chartreuse.fr/pa_trivia_uk.htm">Chartreuse trivia page</a> reports:<br />
<blockquote>Sir Henry Stanley<br />British explorer/journalist Sir Henry Stanley was known to bring Chartreuse Elixir on his expeditions into Africa while searching for Dr. Livingstone. </p></blockquote>
<p>So, did Livingstone carry it or did Stanley? Or did both? I go with both, but the jury is still out.</p>
<p>Later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2006/12/01/bill-parcells-mike-vanderjagt-and-dr-livingstones-frozen-elixir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timmy Smith of DENVER?!</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2005/10/04/timmy-smith-of-denver/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2005/10/04/timmy-smith-of-denver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Timmy Smith (I wonder if he still goes by &#8220;Timmy?&#8221;) got caught (entrapped?) trying to sling some coke. The funniest thing about all this isn&#8217;t the fact that he used autographed pictures as a marketing tool, but instead that &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2005/10/04/timmy-smith-of-denver/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Timmy Smith (I wonder if he still goes by &#8220;Timmy?&#8221;) got caught (entrapped?) trying to sling some coke. The funniest thing about all this isn&#8217;t the fact that he used autographed pictures as a marketing tool, but instead that he lives and was caught in Denver. Those 204 yards he gained in the Superbowl were against a team called the Broncos. </p>
<p>(Personally, I think Elway set him up. )</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051004/ap_on_sp_fo_ne/fbn_smith_arrest">Super Bowl Record Holder Formally Charged &#8211; Yahoo! News</a>: &#8220;DENVER &#8211; Timmy Smith, the former<br />
<br />Washington Redskins running back who set a Super Bowl rushing record in 1988, was formally charged Monday with intentionally possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, a charge that carries a lesser penalty than previously announced.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2005/10/04/timmy-smith-of-denver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Superbowl Prognostications</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2005/02/04/superbowl-prognostications/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2005/02/04/superbowl-prognostications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started a thread on my friend&#8217;s message board, Clever Nothing. If you post on this thread: Clever Nothing :: View topic &#8211; Official Superbowl Prognostication Thread your prediction for the superbowl final score and winner you may win $(100-n) &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2005/02/04/superbowl-prognostications/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started a thread on my friend&#8217;s message board, <a href="http://clevernothing.org/index.php">Clever Nothing</a>. If you post on this thread:<br />
<br /><a href="http://clevernothing.org/viewtopic.php?t=1824&amp;postdays=0&amp;postorder=asc&amp;start=0">Clever Nothing :: View topic &#8211; Official Superbowl Prognostication Thread</a> your prediction for the superbowl final score and winner you may win $(100-n) (Must have paypal). N is the number of unique posters after my post, so make a prediction already! (Of course, I&#8217;m betting on the fact that nobody will get this right.)</p>
<p>These are the predictions so far:<br />
<br />rajah- My prediction: 27-13, Patriots crush the Eagles.<br />
<br />Chook Cheek- I&#8217;ll give it a shot. Patriots 27-23.<br />
<br />orthodox defenestrator= Patriots win 21-17<br />
<br />heatkernel-27-13, Eagles crush the Patriots, defying expectations.<br />
<br />rwellor-21 to 17&#8230; Iggles&#8230;<br />
<br />Graymouser-Eagles win 28-21, pretty-boy Tom Brady becomes a permanent part of the field&#8230;<br />
<br />mach5potato-27 to 17 Pats.<br />
<br />mopreme-i got to go with that pats 35-17<br />
<br />redbeard- 26 &#8211; 12 Patriots, whoever the hell they are. Being named after a missile, they have to be good. What game is this again?<br />
<br />etymxris-43 &#8211; 13. Not sure who&#8217;s going to win, but I&#8217;m being pessimistic. It&#8217;ll probably be over by halftime, just like the last two playoff games.<br />
<br />dogslaughter-The Eagles, 24 &#8211; 17.<br />
<br />webturbo-Patriots all the way.31 &#8211; 24<br />
<br />xthecritic-27-24 pats </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2005/02/04/superbowl-prognostications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

