<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nanothoughts.net &#187; poker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nanothoughts.net/category/poker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nanothoughts.net</link>
	<description>nanothoughts for electric headz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 02:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Degenerate hoser convention, part 1.</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/16/degenerate-hoser-convention-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/16/degenerate-hoser-convention-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solidneon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosing.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[las vegas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/16/degenerate-hoser-convention-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a long-delayed entry from my experiences at this year&#8217;s World Series of Poker. ************* Kyle had been telling me for the past year that the live players at the WSOP tended towards a very low average skill &#8230; <a href="http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/16/degenerate-hoser-convention-part-1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a long-delayed entry from my experiences at this year&#8217;s World Series of Poker.</p>
<p>*************</p>
<p>Kyle had been telling me for the past year that the live players at the WSOP tended towards a very low average skill level. For example, I played(and hosed) the $1500 no-limit holdem event today. I had initially expected the skill level to be somewhere around the level of online $530s. Or at least, $215s.</p>
<p>Today was about the level of online $55s or $33s.</p>
<p>To say the least, I was not impressed with the general level of play. Sure, I could identify a fair number of good players at each table, but rather than having 1 or 2 donks at each table on average, there had to be more like 4-5 donks a table. At least, I was seeing some plays which were completely beyond my comprehension, implying that they were either strokes of genius or complete idiocy. My money&#8217;s on the latter.</p>
<p>Multiple people were getting on me for shaking, thinking that it was a tell. However, as former roommates can attest, my leg tends to twitch/shake constantly anyways, so this probably doesn&#8217;t indicate anything aside from me being the spastic type.<br />
<span id="more-1072"></span><br />
Anyways, we started with 3k chips. 1 hour per blind level, 2 levels to a break. At the first break, I had 4.5k. Going in towards the second break, I was moved to a new table and had about 8.5k chips. One of the dudes there looked familiar. I thought I knew who he was, but didn&#8217;t say anything. As I sat down, Famous Dude butted heads with a slightly shorter stack at the table and lost, leaving himself with about 2.2k.</p>
<p>Blinds were 150/300, 25 antes. Famous Dude was in the big blind. I raised to 1k from mid-position with 77. People fold around to FD, who calls(?!). Flop comes JT8 rainbow. FD jams his remaining 1200 chips, I call. The rest of the table gasps. I turn over my 77. FD turns over&#8230;66. He scowls, doesn&#8217;t get any help on the turn or river, and I bust him.</p>
<p>As the Famous Dude leaves, people at my table are like &#8220;Wow, ballsy call there&#8221; and &#8220;Amazing call.&#8221; Someone asks me &#8220;Do you know who that was?&#8221; I feign ignorance. &#8220;Should I know who he is?&#8221;</p>
<p>The guy next to me says &#8220;That was Ted Forrest.&#8221; [Ed. note- Forrest is considered one of the best 7-card stud players in the world, and a formidable holdem player. He's played $100k/$200k limit holdem against Andy Beal before.] I continue to act clueless. &#8220;Is he really famous?&#8221;</p>
<p>The rest of the table laughs at me.</p>
<p>Really, this sums up the general skill level of today&#8217;s event. With 1200 behind, I was going to call Forrest no matter what came on the flop. That&#8217;s a purely mathematical decision. Even if he had 2500 chips left, I would have called, because my take on it was that Forrest would think &#8220;This kid probably knows who I am and can be intimidated into folding via a stop-and-go play.&#8221; But for 1200 more chips, I&#8217;d have to have been drunk, stoned, and running a 102 fever before considering a fold.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I was getting crap cards for most of the tourney. I did see AA and JJ once, and AKo twice, but that was it over about 6.5 hours of play. I ran into a flush a bit before the third break, leaving me with 2.5k going into dinner. Shortly after dinner, I hosed.</p>
<p>Despite that, I&#8217;m reasonably satisfied with today. I was concentrating well the entire time, I finally grokked that live play here is definitely not at a skill level that&#8217;s beyond me, and by encountering a top pro and coming out well, Mystique and Aura take a couple more steps towards being dancers at a nightclub. I&#8217;ve busted bracelet winners online before, but this felt different.  The game is not nearly as foreign as it was this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/16/degenerate-hoser-convention-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Blogger Championship of Online Poker &#8211; Exclusive Poker Tourrnament</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2006/05/24/world-blogger-championship-of-online-poker-exclusive-poker-tourrnament/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2006/05/24/world-blogger-championship-of-online-poker-exclusive-poker-tourrnament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be playing in this next month. Wish me luck!World Blogger Championship of Online Poker &#8211; Exclusive Poker Tourrnament]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be playing in this next month. Wish me luck!<br /><a href="http://www.pokerstars.com/blog_tournament/">World Blogger Championship of Online Poker &#8211; Exclusive Poker Tourrnament</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2006/05/24/world-blogger-championship-of-online-poker-exclusive-poker-tourrnament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are poker bots raking online pots?</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2004/09/21/are-poker-bots-raking-online-pots/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2004/09/21/are-poker-bots-raking-online-pots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanoAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yet another reason I no longer play online. Really though, poker bots are the least of your worries.From MSNBC: Are poker ‘bots’ raking online pots?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yet another reason I no longer play online. Really though, poker bots are the least of your worries.<br />From MSNBC: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6002298/">Are poker ‘bots’ raking online pots?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2004/09/21/are-poker-bots-raking-online-pots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

