<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nanothoughts.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nanothoughts.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nanothoughts.net</link>
	<description>nanothoughts for electric headz</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Will calorie restricted diets help us live forever?</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/07/10/will-calorie-restricted-diets-help-us-live-forever/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/07/10/will-calorie-restricted-diets-help-us-live-forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JPL</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[academic article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[calories]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[JPL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/?p=1089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a nerd, I like the idea of reading science news.  Unfortunately, science coverage in the general interest press is almost uniformly awful.  There are a lot of reasons for this: reporters can&#8217;t possibly be current in every area of science (and in fact are probably not current in any of them), editors don&#8217;t seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a nerd, I like the idea of reading science news.  Unfortunately, science coverage in the general interest press is almost uniformly awful.  There are a lot of reasons for this: reporters can&#8217;t possibly be current in every area of science (and in fact are probably not current in any of them), editors don&#8217;t seem to think the general public is interested in science except as it immediately applies to their lives (and they&#8217;re probably right), and the process of writing a science news article is like a giant game of password.  When you read a story in a newspaper, what you&#8217;re reading is an article summarizing a press release summarizing a journal article summarizing a study.  Clearly, information is lost, distorted, and spontaneously generated at every step of that process, so what you see in the newspaper often bears little resemblance to what was actually done.  Some amount of that distortion is deliberate:  Scientists try to make the data tell a story, the journal&#8217;s marketers try to write a press release that will get the journal&#8217;s name in papers around the country, the journalist tries to write a story that will get printed, and the editor tries to shape it into something he thinks will sell papers (or magazines, or page views, or whatever).</p>
<p>This rant was brought on by a story in today&#8217;s L.A. Times called &#8220;<a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-sci-caloric-restriction10-2009jul10,0,2287067.story">Permanent diet may equal longer life</a>&#8220;.  It&#8217;s about <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/325/5937/201">a 20-year longtudinal study</a> of reduced calorie (RC) diets in Rhesus macaques (n=76).  As you can guess from the title, the angle is that reduced calorie diets can help humans live longer.  They don&#8217;t take any time getting there, here&#8217;s the first graph (thanks to The Wire, I can throw newsroom slang around like a seasoned pro):</p>
<blockquote><p>For a country in which roughly 200 million people are overweight or obese, scientists today have discouraging news: Even those who maintain a healthy weight probably should be eating less.</p></blockquote>
<p>In the second we get &#8220;It has been shown to significantly extend the lives of yeast, worms, flies, spiders, fish, mice and rats&#8221; followed by</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It adds to the evidence piling up that caloric restriction, independent of thinness, is a healthy way to stay alive and healthy longer,&#8221; said Susan Roberts of the Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, who wasn&#8217;t involved in the study. &#8220;Less diseases in old age has to be something most everyone wants.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>and then &#8220;Mild caloric restriction is beneficial to everybody,&#8221; said Dr. Luigi Fontana, a medical professor at Washington University in St. Louis.&#8221;<em> </em> Oh man, I want to live longer, how do I cut my own calories!?!  That question is answered, and the answer is followed by a competent summary of the study&#8217;s methodology.  But wait a minute&#8230; for those who are still reading, the fifth graph from the end, after the jump, finally comes clean with</p>
<blockquote><p>It also isn&#8217;t clear whether caloric restriction would extend human lives by very much, Phelan said. &#8230; He calculated that reducing intake by 35% would extend the human life span by just two years.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh, but I don&#8217;t understand, calorie restriction is going to make me live longer, and prevent heart disease, cancer, and diabetes!  It&#8217;s going to improve my brain health!  Except it&#8217;s not.  The study doesn&#8217;t support any such conclusions about human health.  I became convinced of that when I checked out the lovely <a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-071009-sci-caloric_restriction-g,0,7082868.graphic">inset graphic</a>.  If I count those dots correctly, 16 of the control group monkeys got diabetes during the study period.  That&#8217;s almost half of the group (the text of the journal article reveals that most of those actually have pre-diabetes, for which they received medical treatment).  Maybe what&#8217;s actually happening here is that the diet they feed the monkeys, referred to in the story as &#8220;lab chow&#8221;, <a href="http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog/archives/2009/03/09/dont-eat-the-monkey-chow/">is actually really bad for them</a>.  The comparison to human nutrition that the Times story wants to imply rests on the assumption that the control regime is somehow equivalent to a typical human diet.  Instead <a href="http://www.labdiet.com">monkey chow</a>*, like most pet food, is a cereal made from the castoffs of human food processing, designed to have low cost and a long shelf life.  All the stuff you can read about it being &#8220;scientifically formulated&#8221; and &#8220;nutritionally balanced&#8221; really just means that it has enough micronutrients (vitamins, minerals, etc.) so that the monkeys won&#8217;t get any of the deficiency diseases (that we know about), and that it&#8217;s balance of macronutrients (fat, protein, carbohydrates) falls within the nutritional consensus.  Of course, we&#8217;ve known for a long time that nutrition is much more complicated that keeping fat low and getting enough B12.</p>
<p>I should note here that this story is also a summing-up of a lot of prior research on reduced calorie diets, which has been an ongoing area of research since about 1935.  This study is far from the only one on which to base claims that such a diet would benefit from humans, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to make nearly as strong a contribution to that argument as the story wants to claim.</p>
<p>*The study does not indicate what food was fed to the monkeys, presumably they made at least the reduced calorie formulation themselves.  All they say is &#8220;Animals in this study are fed a semipurified, nutritionally fortified, low fat diet containing 15% protein and 10% fat.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/07/10/will-calorie-restricted-diets-help-us-live-forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Library of Science articles in the news</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/public-library-of-science-articles-in-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/public-library-of-science-articles-in-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[in the news]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/public-library-of-science-articles-in-the-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PLoS, http://www.plos.org/, In the News sections always has an interesting collection of articles to peruse. Yeah, it&#8217;s mostly biology based, but where else can you get Habsburg Inbreeding, Chimp Meat-Sex Barter, and Red Faced Drinkers?
PLoS journal articles currently receiving widespread media attention: Silent Heart Attacks,   Spanish Habsburg Dynasty Inbreeding,   Semantic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PLoS, <a href="http://www.plos.org/">http://www.plos.org/</a>, In the News sections always has an interesting collection of articles to peruse. Yeah, it&#8217;s mostly biology based, but where else can you get Habsburg Inbreeding, Chimp Meat-Sex Barter, and Red Faced Drinkers?</p>
<p>PLoS journal articles currently receiving widespread media attention: <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/doi/pmed.1000057">Silent Heart Attacks</a>,   <a href="http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0005174">Spanish Habsburg Dynasty Inbreeding</a>,   <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/doi/pcbi.1000361">Semantic Enhancement of PLoS Content</a>,   <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005201">Sound Amplification</a>,   <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/doi/pmed.1000049">Bird Flu</a>,  <a href="http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000058">Evolution-Proof Malaria Insecticide</a>,  <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005151">Sub-Groups of Neanderthal Population</a>,   <a href="http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0005116">Chimpanzees Trade Meat for Sex</a>,   <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/doi/pmed.1000047">Back Pain Evaluation</a>,   <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/doi/pmed.1000046">Pancreatic Cancer Biomarkers</a>,    <a href="http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0005014">Reducing Amazon Fires</a>,   <a href="http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000058">Breakthrough Against Malaria</a>,   <a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000050">Drinkers&#8217; Red Faces and Cancer Risk</a>,  <a href="http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0004838">Romanov DNA</a>,  <a href="http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0004803">Map of Science</a>,  <a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000043">UV Light and TB Spread</a>, and  <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/doi/ppat.1000352">Herpes Virus Reactivation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/public-library-of-science-articles-in-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Roston does not know the difference between Google Hot Trends and most popular searches overall</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/michael-roston-does-not-know-the-difference-between-google-hot-trends-and-most-popular-searches-overall/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/michael-roston-does-not-know-the-difference-between-google-hot-trends-and-most-popular-searches-overall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[flue]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google hot trends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[michael roston]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[orthography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pompous]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/michael-roston-does-not-know-the-difference-between-google-hot-trends-and-most-popular-searches-overall/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over on True/Slant, Michael Roston opines:
Read it and weep, Internet-using America. The fifth most common search on Google earlier this morning, via Google Trends, was ’swine flue.’ Not ‘flu’ as in influenza, but ‘flue’
Hmmm. I guess he doesn&#8217;t understand the difference between Google Hot Trends and Google&#8217;s most popular searches overall. From their FAQ:
 Hot Trends [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over on True/Slant, <a href="http://trueslant.com/level/2009/04/27/america-does-not-know-the-difference-between-flue-and-flu/">Michael Roston opines</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><quote>Read it and weep, Internet-using America. The fifth most common search on Google earlier this morning, via Google Trends, was ’swine flue.’ Not ‘flu’ as in influenza, but ‘flue’</quote></p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmm. I guess he doesn&#8217;t understand the difference between Google Hot Trends and Google&#8217;s most popular searches overall. From<a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/trends/about.html"> their FAQ</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> <font size="-1">Hot Trends reflects what people are searching for on Google today. Rather than showing the most popular searches overall, which would always be generic terms like &#8216;weather,&#8217; Hot Trends highlights searches that experience sudden surges in popularity, and updates that information hourly.</font></p></blockquote>
<p>For the actual comparison of flu to flue, look here: <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=swine+flu%2C+swine+flue&amp;ctab=0">http://www.google.com/trends?q=swine+flu%2C+swine+flue&amp;ctab=0</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s about 1.00 to 0 with flu in the lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2009/04/29/michael-roston-does-not-know-the-difference-between-google-hot-trends-and-most-popular-searches-overall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s in a name?</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/29/whats-in-a-name/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/29/whats-in-a-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[resumes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/29/whats-in-a-name/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article reminded me of the chapter in Freakanomics that talks about naming kids, race and socioeconomic success. And there have been a boatload of older studies about resumes with distinctly black names not getting callbacks for interviews. So, imagine if Obama was only able to submit his resume (which is admittedly thin) and never [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081129/D94OJE2G0.html">This article</a> reminded me of the chapter in Freakanomics that talks about <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2116449/">naming kids, race and socioeconomic success</a>. And there have been a boatload of older studies about resumes with distinctly black names not getting callbacks for interviews. So, imagine if Obama was only able to submit his resume (which is admittedly thin) and never be seen. He wouldn&#8217;t have been able to use his superior marketing, organizational efforts and silver tongue to get elected. Also, we never would&#8217;ve known he was a <a href="http://snltranscripts.jt.org/76/76rblackperspective.phtml">light skinned black and not a dark skinned black</a>. (Btw, I never realized until now that that was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Bond">Julian Bond </a>interviewing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrett_Morris">Garret Morris</a> in that skit.) Most voters would&#8217;ve only seen his resume and recoiled at his decidedly African and Arabic name. But in reality, nobody did that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/29/whats-in-a-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melamine tableware</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/25/melamine-tableware/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/25/melamine-tableware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[endcap]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[melamine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organic chemistry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tableware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/29/melamine-tableware/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I walked into my neighborhood drugstore yesterday and was greeted by a melamine tableware endcap.

e.g. http://www.alibaba.com/catalog/11037899/Melamine_Tableware.html
People want to put their food on plates made out of melamine?! Apparently it polymerizes too (when combined with formaldehyde, how appropriate). Who knew?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked into my neighborhood drugstore yesterday and was greeted by a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melamine" title="melamine">melamine</a> tableware endcap.</p>
<p><a href="http://nanothoughts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/melamine_tableware.jpg" title="Melamine tableware"><img src="http://nanothoughts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/melamine_tableware.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Melamine tableware" /></a></p>
<p>e.g. <a href="http://www.alibaba.com/catalog/11037899/Melamine_Tableware.html">http://www.alibaba.com/catalog/11037899/Melamine_Tableware.html</a></p>
<p>People want to put their food on plates made out of melamine?! Apparently<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melamine_resin" title="melamine resin"> it polymerizes too </a>(when combined with<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formaldehyde"> formaldehyde</a>, how appropriate). Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/25/melamine-tableware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/05/changes/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/05/changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[black president]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elected]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unbelievable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/05/changes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;And although it seems heaven sent we aint ready, to see a black president, uhh&#8221;
-Tupac Shakur
I totally agreed with Tupac when this song came out, and even as recently as a year ago. Maybe even a few months ago. But today I voted for Obama and so did millions others. And he won. Amazing. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And although it seems heaven sent we aint ready, to see a black president, uhh&#8221;</p>
<p>-Tupac Shakur</p>
<p>I totally agreed with Tupac when this song came out, and even as recently as a year ago. Maybe even a few months ago. But today I voted for Obama and so did millions others. And he won. Amazing. It&#8217;s truly historic, I don&#8217;t know what else to say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/11/05/changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Somebody is buying interesting ads on political sites</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/10/29/somebody-is-buying-interesting-ads-on-political-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/10/29/somebody-is-buying-interesting-ads-on-political-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[538.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fivethirtyeight]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fivethirtyeight.com]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/10/29/somebody-is-buying-interesting-ads-on-political-sites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ So, I was over on the awesome polling and statistics site,  fivethirtyeight.com and on their main page, I was greeted by the following ad:

Not your typical fivethirtyeight.com ad, but with the election less than a week away, maybe some will try anything to change the outcome.
Here&#8217;s the full webpage screenshot scaled down:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So, I was over on the awesome polling and statistics site,  <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/" title="538.com">fivethirtyeight.com</a> and on their main page, I was greeted by the following ad:</p>
<p><a href="http://nanothoughts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/fivethirtyeightcom-ad-crop.png" title="FiveThirtyEight.com Ad crop"><img src="http://nanothoughts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/fivethirtyeightcom-ad-crop.thumbnail.png" alt="FiveThirtyEight.com Ad crop" /></a></p>
<p>Not your typical fivethirtyeight.com ad, but with the election less than a week away, maybe some will try anything to change the outcome.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the full webpage screenshot scaled down:</p>
<p><a href="http://nanothoughts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/fivethirtyeightcom-entire-webpage-scaled-down.png" title="FiveThirtyEight.com website 7pm 10-29-08 scaled down"><img src="http://nanothoughts.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/fivethirtyeightcom-entire-webpage-scaled-down.thumbnail.png" alt="FiveThirtyEight.com website 7pm 10-29-08 scaled down" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/10/29/somebody-is-buying-interesting-ads-on-political-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current fave tracks (of the moment)</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/30/current-fave-tracks-of-the-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/30/current-fave-tracks-of-the-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chairlift]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gaslight anthem]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[girl talk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[killers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[kings of leon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[metro station]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[verve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/30/current-fave-tracks-of-the-moment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sex on Fire - Kings of Leon , great song
The &#8216;59 Sound - Gaslight  				Anthem
Love Is Noise - The Verve, William Blake paraphrased over a Tomorrow Never Knows backdrop. so awesome.
Human - The Killers , released today and even an average Killers track is still pretty freaking good
Play Your Part (Pt. 1) - Girl [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sex on Fire - Kings of Leon , great song</p>
<p>The &#8216;59 Sound - Gaslight  				Anthem</p>
<p>Love Is Noise - The Verve, William Blake paraphrased over a Tomorrow Never Knows backdrop. so awesome.</p>
<p>Human - The Killers , released today and even an average Killers track is still pretty freaking good</p>
<p>Play Your Part (Pt. 1) - Girl Talk, great mashup, this dude is a genius</p>
<p>Bruises - Chairlift , low-fi Postal Service duet material</p>
<p>Time to Pretend - MGMT, &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling rough, I&#8217;m feeling raw, I&#8217;m in the prime of my life.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kelsey - Metro Station</p>
<p>Walcott - Vampire Weekend</p>
<p>Make Your Own Kind of Music - Mama Cass</p>
<p>Famous Blue Raincoat - Leonard Cohen</p>
<p>Fidelity - Regina Spektor, saw her open a concert in 2005, didn&#8217;t appreciate it at the time&#8230;</p>
<p>Pretty in Pink - Purplespace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/30/current-fave-tracks-of-the-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Head of Skate</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/28/head-of-skate/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/28/head-of-skate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fake trailer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[head of skate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hockey mom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/28/head-of-skate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome fake trailer for a Disney &#8220;hocky mom as VP&#8221; feel good hit of the year:

See more funny videos and funny pictures at CollegeHumor.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome fake trailer for a Disney &#8220;hocky mom as VP&#8221; feel good hit of the year:</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.collegehumor.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1831461&#038;fullscreen=1" width="640" height="360" ><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="true" /><param name="movie" quality="best" value="http://www.collegehumor.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1831461&#038;fullscreen=1" /></object>
<div style="padding:5px 0; text-align:center; width:640px;">See more <a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/videos">funny videos</a> and <a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/pictures">funny pictures</a> at <a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/">CollegeHumor</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/28/head-of-skate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Presidential Debate 2008, Lehrer/McCain/Obama Live Chat/Blog</title>
		<link>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/27/first-presidential-debate-2008-lehrermccainobama-live-chatblog/</link>
		<comments>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/27/first-presidential-debate-2008-lehrermccainobama-live-chatblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[e-dawg]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[height of koreans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jim lehrer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mcbrain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mcc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[o-dogg]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ole miss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rza]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[surge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tbone pikkens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[waziristan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/27/first-presidential-debate-2008-lehrermccainobama-live-chatblog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8:58 PM tbone pikkens: i am 8 tabling
gonna be hard to stay involved
RZA: dude
sit out
8:59 PM i have cnn on
they have a counter
37 seconds!
9:00 PM the crisis
what channel do you have on?
9:02 PM tbone pikkens: cnbc
RZA: jesus christ
they still have the ticker going on
at the bottom
9:03 PM i can&#8217;t stand that
switiching back
wonder if O feels [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8:58 PM tbone pikkens: i am 8 tabling<br />
gonna be hard to stay involved<br />
RZA: dude<br />
sit out<br />
8:59 PM i have cnn on<br />
they have a counter<br />
37 seconds!<br />
9:00 PM the crisis<br />
what channel do you have on?<br />
9:02 PM tbone pikkens: cnbc<br />
RZA: jesus christ<br />
they still have the ticker going on<br />
at the bottom<br />
9:03 PM i can&#8217;t stand that<br />
switiching back<br />
wonder if O feels like a dick there<br />
for raising his arm so high<br />
bam<br />
right off to economy<br />
<em>(Ed: there&#8217;s a lot more)</em><br />
<span id="more-1073"></span><br />
9:04 PM cnn<br />
has an audience reaction meter<br />
at bottom<br />
9:05 PM whoa<br />
&#8220;if and when the market returns&#8221;<br />
golden parachutes<br />
9:06 PM senator kennedy shout out by MC<br />
9:09 PM E-dawg: hi<br />
RZA: hey<br />
we are live chatting<br />
the debate<br />
sorta<br />
tbone is playing poker<br />
E-dawg: yes<br />
I see<br />
RZA: while occasionalyy prophesizing doom<br />
9:10 PM E-dawg: I&#8217;m covering the PBS angle<br />
RZA: word<br />
E-dawg: they have no graphics<br />
RZA: it&#8217;s prolly better<br />
yeah<br />
E-dawg: hey<br />
there also using words with more syllables in the PBS version!<br />
9:11 PM I missed the first few mins<br />
so is it all going to be domestic?<br />
RZA: no<br />
this is foreign policy one<br />
but global criis<br />
E-dawg: good<br />
RZA: is foreign<br />
9:12 PM E-dawg: what&#8217;s with this moderator?<br />
RZA: lol<br />
E-dawg: I know who he is<br />
RZA: really<br />
?<br />
obama was funny<br />
mc was too a bit<br />
9:13 PM E-dawg: I just mean, why is he telling O to talk to McC<br />
RZA: yeah<br />
boost the ratings<br />
lol<br />
9:13<br />
timestamping vs. points<br />
for refernce<br />
his left eye looks ok<br />
which is good<br />
9:14 PM E-dawg: we&#8217;re the greatest improrter!<br />
yeah!<br />
RZA: he doesn&#8217; seem as depressed<br />
E-dawg: do you know<br />
Japan now has a trade DEFICIT<br />
unbelievable<br />
RZA: nice<br />
no, didn&#8217;t know that<br />
9:15 PM E-dawg: refers to Great Society<br />
like anyone will know what that is<br />
RZA: i&#8217;m sure china is importing tons of stuff<br />
&#8220;gateway durg&#8221; nice<br />
E-dawg: yeah, too bad that whole concept is BS<br />
RZA: mccain is anti DNA!!!!<br />
E-dawg: ?<br />
RZA: the bear dna montana study<br />
he reference<br />
9:16 PM d<br />
E-dawg: odf<br />
oh<br />
RZA: lol<br />
O is so clean!<br />
says O!<br />
9:17 PM they will talk about money<br />
E-dawg: yeah, O is spouting too many figures<br />
RZA: for 20 minutes prolly<br />
and then talk about bomb bomb bomb iran<br />
well<br />
E-dawg: McC is talking in slogans and colorful images<br />
i.e. McC is &#8220;winning&#8221;<br />
RZA: that is so that people say he is too vauge<br />
can&#8217;s say it anymore<br />
word<br />
O needs to get emotional<br />
9:18 PM E-dawg: yeah, being specific<br />
isn&#8217;t any good if people can&#8217;t process the specifics<br />
RZA: man<br />
hearing these guys<br />
Palin is gonna be toast<br />
E-dawg: dude<br />
RZA: back shot of MC<br />
9:19 PM E-dawg: McC said &#8220;Ms. Congeniality&#8221;<br />
RZA: i didn&#8217;t see a backpack<br />
haven&#8217;t seen O&#8217;s back<br />
yes<br />
E-dawg: so far<br />
just listening to the speaking styles, not the content<br />
RZA: PBS has such shitty video quality<br />
E-dawg: McC has better flow and cadence<br />
really<br />
let me try another channel<br />
9:20 PM RZA: O&#8217;s tie is vibrating<br />
cuz of the cam. resoluaiont<br />
rez<br />
lehrer is acting like a marriage counselour<br />
this is hilarous<br />
&#8220;respond to him directly!&#8221;<br />
E-dawg: yeah, it&#8217;s weird<br />
9:21 PM RZA: i like it<br />
adds to the comedy<br />
The Revolution Will Be Comedified!<br />
E-dawg: I have some other stuff to do<br />
I will wander back<br />
RZA: 2000 what?<br />
E-dawg: when they start talking about foreign policy<br />
RZA: i wasn&#8217;t paying attention<br />
932 million of pork barrel<br />
too many number<br />
9:22 PM back of O shot<br />
no backpack<br />
it&#8217;s a backpackless debate!<br />
9:21<br />
tbone pikkens: obama is getting slaughtered<br />
E-dawg: he&#8217;s not doing well, so far<br />
+<br />
RZA: how is he getting slaughtered?<br />
9:23 PM E-dawg: slaughtered is an exaggeration<br />
RZA: dude, it&#8217;s all about whichever 2 soundbites<br />
make it out into the AP articles<br />
tbone is playing poker<br />
disregard him<br />
E-dawg: hah<br />
RZA: 9:23<br />
9:24 PM E-dawg: McC overrode moderator<br />
RZA: walking the walk<br />
talking the talk<br />
points to MC<br />
for taking charge<br />
I&#8221;M VOTING FOR MCCAIN!!!!<br />
O interrupted with aside<br />
but i didn&#8217;t ehar it<br />
MC up by a touchdown!<br />
MC has a weird tie on<br />
9:25 PM E-dawg: I dont&#8217; get it<br />
RZA: but O&#8217;s has that weird moire pattern<br />
lehrer<br />
is lvoing this<br />
cuz now they are mixing it up<br />
E-dawg: why isn&#8217;t Obama bringing up McC&#8217;s record<br />
RZA: that&#8217;s why he let MC railroad him<br />
E-dawg: guy&#8217;s been in the senate for 20 years<br />
RZA: yes<br />
E-dawg: one of the keating 5 for god&#8217;s sake<br />
9:26 PM RZA: 9:26<br />
9:27 PM first michigan and ohio mention<br />
9:28 PM first CHINA mention!<br />
taikonauts<br />
BROADBAND!!<br />
lol<br />
going for the rural broadband vote<br />
that is awesome<br />
that&#8217;s 10 more votes<br />
9:29 PM E-dawg: how the hell could Obama have the most liberal voting record<br />
RZA: NO TO ETHANOL SUBSIDIES!!!<br />
E-dawg: more liberal than Kennedy?<br />
RZA: he was for 2006<br />
but in 2007<br />
he went way center<br />
it&#8217;s on e-v.com<br />
E-dawg: yeah, well it&#8217;s subjective to some extent<br />
RZA: 9:29<br />
9:30 PM it&#8217;s those diff. rating orgs<br />
and they avg them<br />
yes, very subj<br />
but it&#8217;s a metric<br />
of some sort<br />
and correlates well<br />
with CW<br />
conv. wisdowm<br />
9:31 PM lehrer is pissed<br />
he wants specifics<br />
E-dawg: why the hell does O keep saying &#8220;John&#8217;s right!&#8221;<br />
RZA: first time O says &#8220;john&#8217;s right&#8221;<br />
oh<br />
E-dawg: no, at least the 2nd<br />
RZA: guess not first time<br />
E-dawg: maybe not that exact word<br />
but I think I heard it before<br />
anyway, he&#8217;s coming off as way less aggressive<br />
9:32 PM RZA: &#8220;wildly liberal&#8221;<br />
E-dawg: maybe that&#8217;s bad<br />
or maybe good<br />
RZA: well<br />
we don&#8217;t want angry black man<br />
E-dawg: yeah, it cuts both ways, definitely<br />
tbone pikkens: google for govt<br />
jeezus<br />
RZA: lol<br />
yeah<br />
that did make me laugh<br />
9:33 PM spending freeze!<br />
FREEZE<br />
SE BUSCA FREEZE!!!<br />
E-dawg: except defense<br />
tbone pikkens: mcbrain<br />
RZA: first FREEZE mention!!!!<br />
tbone pikkens: what an idiot<br />
E-dawg: and entitlements<br />
RZA: lol<br />
E-dawg: and something else which I forget<br />
or didn&#8217;t hear<br />
RZA: &#8220;hatchet instead of scalpel&#8221;<br />
that was a great line<br />
E-dawg: that was his first decent line<br />
RZA: veterans<br />
yah<br />
E-dawg: &#8220;and all that&#8221;<br />
RZA: wow<br />
9:34 PM E-dawg: yeah, all those namby pamby liberal alt energy BS thigns<br />
RZA: he rolled off like 6 energy technologies<br />
in about 4 seconds<br />
E-dawg: and dismissed them<br />
RZA: lol<br />
NUCLEAR<br />
NOT NUCULAR<br />
he got it right<br />
E-dawg: cool<br />
got my vote<br />
RZA: points to MC<br />
MC is coming off really good<br />
on an emotional level<br />
E-dawg: yes<br />
RZA: i almost want to vote for him<br />
tbone pikkens: my financial crisis is over<br />
i just won a $20 pot<br />
RZA: but then my brain fires up<br />
9:35 PM lol<br />
nice<br />
E-dawg: yeah, so eliminate that brain<br />
E-dawg: and now you have a cross-section of the American public<br />
RZA: when will the Austrian school come up?<br />
E-dawg: hah<br />
RZA: and mccain can bust out his Hayek knowledge<br />
9:36 PM E-dawg: around the time Hell freezes over?<br />
no one&#8217;s going to bring up Austrians<br />
RZA: AHNULD?<br />
E-dawg: well, remember the last time a faltering empire let an Austrian take over<br />
9:37 PM RZA: california?<br />
9:36<br />
those arm movements of mccain<br />
bug me<br />
hate to say it<br />
too bad connie chung isn&#8217;t the moderator<br />
MC would let a &#8220;gook&#8221; slip, you know it<br />
9:38 PM tbone pikkens: ORGY!<br />
RZA: lol<br />
FIRST ORGY MENTION<br />
THE BLACK MAN IS SEXUALLY PREDATORING<br />
2nd ms. congeniality mention<br />
Sandra Bulluck vote?<br />
E-dawg: calls himself a maverick<br />
RZA: MAVERICK!!!!<br />
9:39 PM E-dawg: ok, fainlly<br />
RZA: vietnam!<br />
iraq<br />
9:38<br />
E-dawg: finally some frickin foreign policy<br />
9:40 PM this is probably the longest time I have ever listened to McC<br />
I can see why he&#8217;s gotten as far as he has<br />
9:42 PM RZA: O: &#8220;never hestitate&#8221;<br />
trying to win over some hawks<br />
9:44 PM first Biden mentoin<br />
E-dawg: I don&#8217;t know<br />
maybe it&#8217;s just me<br />
RZA: go delaware!<br />
E-dawg: as much as I hate McC<br />
RZA: &#8220;senate inside baseball&#8221;<br />
E-dawg: he seems to be wiping the floor with Obama<br />
RZA: yeah, obama isn&#8217;t as great a debater<br />
as he is a speech giver<br />
E-dawg: Obama seems to be afraid to land a blow<br />
9:45 PM RZA: he going at him now<br />
E-dawg: finally he is<br />
and he stumbled<br />
RZA: shia / sunni mention<br />
E-dawg: he gives an impression of being intimidated<br />
and McC comes across as smug and dismissive<br />
9:46 PM yeah, I remember the Dem debates<br />
Obama was not impressive there either<br />
but it seems that he is even worse here<br />
9:48 PM he is just constantly on the defensive<br />
RZA: i need a beer<br />
yeah<br />
E-dawg: yeah, it&#8217;s pretty bad<br />
RZA: beer #2!<br />
9:49 PM on the cnn audience reaction though<br />
they are about even<br />
with maybe MC a slight edge<br />
E-dawg: self selection<br />
more liberals tune in to CNN<br />
RZA: oh<br />
i don&#8217;t know how it works<br />
E-dawg: I told you<br />
RZA: i guess it&#8217;s on a website<br />
E-dawg: that Obama saying<br />
9:50 PM RZA: u did ?<br />
E-dawg: the surge worked<br />
was a terrible mistkae<br />
I think I told you<br />
anyway I said it to a lot of people<br />
RZA: O is just happy<br />
tbone pikkens: obama is getting crushed<br />
RZA: to move on<br />
E-dawg: now I do agree<br />
tbone pikkens: its getting ugly<br />
RZA: dude<br />
9:51 PM like i said<br />
it&#8217;ll be<br />
E-dawg: it&#8217;s interesting to see<br />
RZA: the 2-3 soundbites<br />
E-dawg: no matter how bad things get<br />
RZA: that make it into the repititionsphere<br />
E-dawg: the Dems can still lose a debate<br />
RZA: lol<br />
lol<br />
AQ greatest threat??!?!?<br />
9:52 PM how about pakistan or russia or china?<br />
E-dawg: dude, it&#8217;s all mythology<br />
RZA: POPPY TRADE!!!!<br />
E-dawg: the Dems have to stick to their mythology<br />
RZA: i know<br />
E-dawg: he knows OBL is dead<br />
or living in a house in Qetta, Pakistan<br />
RZA: i&#8217;m waiting for McCain&#8217;s out of the box debate move<br />
9:53 PM E-dawg: uhhh<br />
RZA: I&#8221;M SUSPENDING THIS DEBATE!!!!<br />
E-dawg: I think it&#8217;s time for Obama to make an out of the box move<br />
RZA: obama is too much lawyer at times<br />
mccain is naval aviator<br />
9:54 PM tbone pikkens: this is a blood bath<br />
RZA: lol<br />
ALEXANDER THE GREAT!!!<br />
WAZIRISTAN!!!!<br />
E-dawg: yeah, he got a few words<br />
RZA: man, palin would be blown away<br />
E-dawg: well, she&#8217;s going to debate Biden<br />
she can learn a few words under pressure too<br />
RZA: he knows waziristan<br />
don&#8217;t front on Biden</p>
<p>E-dawg: well, he&#8217;s going to win<br />
9:55 PM I&#8217;m just sayin<br />
RZA: he won&#8217;t shut up about petraeus<br />
word<br />
E-dawg: just every single question<br />
Obama lets McC set the terms<br />
and is on the defensive<br />
9:56 PM did O put ANY thought into this beforehand<br />
RZA: YES!!!<br />
tbone pikkens: BOOM!<br />
BOOM!<br />
E-dawg: McC right again<br />
tbone pikkens: BOOM!<br />
RZA: sung songs about bombing iran<br />
that is awesome<br />
lol<br />
E-dawg: to us it is<br />
but he has to be way, way more dogged<br />
RZA: i don&#8217;t think pbs<br />
uses split screen enough<br />
E-dawg: for people at home<br />
RZA: cnn is aobutl the split<br />
9:57 PM E-dawg: who don&#8217;t follow stuff obsessively<br />
to get his point<br />
he&#8217;s too understated<br />
ahhh<br />
here we go&#8230;.<br />
RZA: lol<br />
E-dawg: (I&#8217;m watching CBS now btw)<br />
RZA: this business about bombing iran<br />
9:58 PM LEBANON!<br />
Taleb<br />
would love this<br />
E-dawg: yeah, first time Obama got McC on the slight defensive<br />
tbone pikkens: ok<br />
i shut down poker<br />
E-dawg: this is a huge irrelevant digression<br />
RZA: coo<br />
tbone pikkens: x is ready to comment<br />
E-dawg: he supported some bloody interventions<br />
tbone pikkens: on the festivities<br />
E-dawg: and opposed others<br />
RZA: somalia? what&#8217;s that<br />
that is ancient history<br />
9:59 PM E-dawg: exactly<br />
RZA: lol<br />
tbone pikkens: mcbrain is doing a great job<br />
of making shit up<br />
E-dawg: yeah<br />
tbone pikkens: and he is winning this<br />
RZA: NEW HAMPSHIRE!!!<br />
tbone pikkens: despite that great one liner<br />
RZA: LIVE FREE OR DIE!!!!<br />
tbone pikkens: and the use of orgy<br />
RZA: lol<br />
tbone pikkens: btw<br />
i just picked up $16<br />
after losing $15<br />
$30 swing<br />
E-dawg: well<br />
I don&#8217;t think this talk about dead sons<br />
10:00 PM is a great move<br />
RZA: whoa<br />
E-dawg: it might fire up the base<br />
RZA: is this almost over?<br />
tbone pikkens: yes<br />
RZA: 1 minute?<br />
tbone pikkens: it doesnt matter to me<br />
RZA: 9:59<br />
tbone pikkens: but it will to the base<br />
RZA: wild<br />
tbone pikkens: i have a bracelet<br />
E-dawg: but it is not going to be popular among the independents<br />
tbone pikkens: on my cawk<br />
E-dawg: ?<br />
tbone pikkens: cawk ring<br />
RZA: lol<br />
10:01 PM tbone pikkens: x is here<br />
to bring cutting edge<br />
commentary<br />
E-dawg: Oama is also full of shit<br />
stamp out the Taliban?<br />
10:02 PM good luck!<br />
tbone pikkens: word<br />
E-dawg: want to kill 18mil. Pashtun?<br />
10:03 PM what this is only 1 hour?<br />
RZA: oh<br />
tbone pikkens: how long is it?<br />
RZA: how long is this?<br />
90 minutes?<br />
E-dawg: haha<br />
maybe<br />
tbone pikkens: mine is 8 inches<br />
RZA: lol<br />
yeah, right<br />
tbone pikkens: good point<br />
u are winning the debate<br />
RZA: with or without flap?<br />
E-dawg: ha<br />
10:04 PM ah, the League of Democracies<br />
tbone pikkens: i am out of beer<br />
RZA: i boght a 12 pack<br />
of busch<br />
brb<br />
10:04<br />
tbone pikkens: which of these<br />
E-dawg: brb too<br />
tbone pikkens: guys is going to<br />
10:05 PM help me get beer<br />
E-dawg: McC<br />
obviously<br />
tbone pikkens: nice<br />
E-dawg: all Obama is going to do is Organize your Community<br />
tbone pikkens: he is getting killed<br />
he cant handle foreign policy<br />
10:06 PM RZA: yeah<br />
his audience meter right now<br />
is barely above midline<br />
E-dawg: well Obama is lying now<br />
tbone pikkens: where is that?<br />
10:07 PM E-dawg: we&#8217;ve sponsored more terrorism in Iran<br />
RZA: cnn<br />
has a aud. meter<br />
E-dawg: than they&#8217;ve sponsored against us<br />
the latter being 0<br />
RZA: and btw<br />
it has 3 lines<br />
GOP, DEM, and IND<br />
it&#8217;s pretty cool<br />
E-dawg: yeah, let&#8217;s hope Obama does better on domestic<br />
the timing sucks<br />
tbone pikkens: ;oml<br />
E-dawg: this would have been a great time for Obama to romp over McC in domestic policy<br />
tbone pikkens: link<br />
link<br />
10:08 PM RZA: tv<br />
cnn<br />
tbone pikkens: LOL<br />
RZA: lol<br />
tbone pikkens: LOLOL<br />
RZA: LOL<br />
that was aweosme<br />
tbone pikkens: his eyes almost popped out<br />
RZA: AHCKMEDIDNEJAD<br />
that is going in my video mashup<br />
LOL<br />
10:09 PM tbone pikkens: with glass jaw joe?<br />
RZA: i had a point<br />
about how<br />
MC is makinng this whole debate about O&#8217;s bleiefs<br />
he has a great gameplan<br />
prediction:<br />
Obama will have backpack for next debate<br />
tbone pikkens: i guess<br />
but this is a disaster<br />
10:10 PM E-dawg: well<br />
tbone pikkens: my tv is so crappy<br />
E-dawg: you can&#8217;t accept all the warmongers presuppositions<br />
tbone pikkens: i cant tell what color the lines are<br />
E-dawg: and lies<br />
and then expect to win the debate with them<br />
virtually everything that has been said is a lie<br />
by both of them<br />
RZA: ok, hippy!<br />
tbone pikkens: i lied also<br />
E-dawg: but it is forbidden to question those lies in the US press<br />
tbone pikkens: about my cawk size<br />
10:11 PM but that was in the heat of debate<br />
RZA: lol<br />
E-dawg: well, see<br />
RZA questioned it<br />
tbone pikkens: word<br />
RZA: lol<br />
tbone pikkens: good point<br />
RZA should be in the media<br />
RZA: i fact checked it<br />
E-dawg: what does wikileaks say?<br />
tbone pikkens: primary research or secondary?<br />
RZA: flaccid or turgid<br />
it was a lie<br />
E-dawg: errr&#8230;never mind<br />
RZA: wikileaks on x the cawk size<br />
10:12 PM lol<br />
tbone pikkens: secondary i hope<br />
RZA: tbone doesn&#8217;t forget , he doest forgive, he has over 9000 inches and they&#8217;re all stamping on full tilt<br />
DR KISSINGER<br />
tbone pikkens: a seal?<br />
10:13 PM RZA: yeah<br />
prez seal<br />
it&#8217;s like a stamp<br />
tbone pikkens: nice<br />
you&#8217;ve been stamped!<br />
RZA: his arm<br />
so weir<br />
d<br />
i&#8217;d be more comfortalbe<br />
if he just kept arms low<br />
poor guy<br />
HEIGHT OF KOREANS!!!!<br />
10:14 PM tbone pikkens: ilbung<br />
RZA: DEAR LEADER!!!!<br />
this is aweomse<br />
i just IMed il bung<br />
tbone pikkens: i almost did<br />
RZA: RZA: dood<br />
u watching this<br />
height of koreans just came up<br />
no response<br />
E-dawg: y<br />
RZA: e-dawg</p>
<p>10:15 PM E-dawg: I had to defend a corncob<br />
RZA: were you checking wikileaks?<br />
E-dawg: from my cat<br />
RZA: corncob<br />
tbone pikkens: lol<br />
RZA: nice<br />
is that your name for it<br />
tbone pikkens: sounds like a wild night<br />
in minnesota<br />
LOL<br />
RZA: dood<br />
mccain<br />
is jumping all over him<br />
tbone pikkens: he is treating him like a kid<br />
and its working<br />
E-dawg: yeah, this is a disaster<br />
10:16 PM yeah, every answer is like<br />
RZA: PUTIN!!!!!<br />
E-dawg: this guy is such a rube<br />
RZA: her comes putin!!!<br />
Medvedev<br />
E-dawg: I have expereicne,<br />
blah blah<br />
why doesn&#8217;t Obama say, why did you pick someone who knows NOTHING as VP THEN?<br />
tbone pikkens: barak is gettinb annoyed<br />
RZA: yes<br />
10:17 PM yeah<br />
he should<br />
tbone pikkens: i have never seen him flustsered b4<br />
E-dawg: he&#8217;s doing ok<br />
when he is speaking on his own<br />
10:18 PM but he can&#8217;t handle the brawling<br />
tbone pikkens: yep<br />
RZA: word<br />
tbone pikkens: mcbrain jumps all over him<br />
RZA gets excited<br />
when that happens<br />
man love<br />
RZA: naivete<br />
tbone pikkens: boom<br />
E-dawg: petrodolalrs?<br />
10:19 PM RZA: PETRODOLLARS<br />
E-dawg: KGB!<br />
RZA: nice<br />
lol<br />
oh man<br />
E-dawg: who the hell remembers that?<br />
RZA: mccain has better writers<br />
tbone pikkens: i dont know<br />
E-dawg: what about the NKVD?<br />
OGPU?<br />
RZA: dude<br />
E-dawg: I think the Czarist sectret police<br />
RZA: kgb is still the one people know<br />
E-dawg: are after me!<br />
RZA: CHECKA<br />
10:20 PM shakasvillk<br />
is he gonna say it<br />
&#8220;WE ARE ALL GEORGIANS NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&#8221;<br />
E-dawg: I was talking to an Azeri today<br />
tbone pikkens: altanta?<br />
E-dawg: not Gary Kasparov though<br />
gary&#8217;s brother<br />
he said Aliyev<br />
tbone pikkens: PUT YOUR ARM DOWN<br />
10:21 PM E-dawg: is just pretending to be a US ally<br />
RZA: lol<br />
E-dawg: and that he went to Moscow right after Cheney left<br />
RZA: i know the hand/arm weirds me out<br />
Aliyev?<br />
who is that<br />
E-dawg: the pres. of Azer.<br />
RZA: &lt;&#8212;&#8211; dumb american<br />
ok<br />
10:22 PM who is armenia<br />
i&#8217;m going to turkey<br />
E-dawg: dont&#8217; know<br />
RZA: so i need to remembe rthat i hate that guy<br />
ok<br />
E-dawg: I&#8217;m not sure if they have a dictator<br />
Aliyev is a dictator<br />
who is the son of the previous dictator<br />
i.e. it is a<br />
already dynastic<br />
10:23 PM RZA: dude this is so awesome<br />
that oil is getting play<br />
even if it sucks<br />
m. king hubbert gonna come up?<br />
10:24 PM tbone pikkens: clean colon<br />
E-dawg: he has said some variance<br />
of John and I agree<br />
variant<br />
of that at least 10 times<br />
re-using walk the walk<br />
RZA: pain at the pump<br />
dude<br />
10:25 PM obama can never interrupt<br />
mccain<br />
he&#8217;s too weak<br />
E-dawg: yeah, this is terrible<br />
shit<br />
McC shut him down<br />
10:26 PM RZA: wow<br />
tbone pikkens: yeah<br />
RZA: he gave up there<br />
tbone pikkens: disaster<br />
RZA: that is sad<br />
tbone pikkens: total disaster<br />
E-dawg: he is throwing hte debate<br />
tbone pikkens: mcbrain&#8217;s head almost popped off<br />
right there<br />
he started bobbing<br />
RZA: lol<br />
10:27 PM E-dawg: at least people don&#8217;t give a f*** about foreing policy<br />
RZA: obama was a wimp tonight<br />
bowing to the massah<br />
E-dawg: maybe McC did just pull the whole stund<br />
stunt<br />
in order to<br />
draw more attention to the debate<br />
10:28 PM RZA: could be<br />
E-dawg: &#8217;cause he figured he do well in foreign policy<br />
I think the 538 people speculated that<br />
RZA: i think they&#8217;d love it either way<br />
if it gets pos. reaction<br />
psotpone it<br />
and boom, no vp debate<br />
if not, get more people to tune in<br />
10:29 PM and watch it<br />
E-dawg: yeah<br />
RZA: i think obama should&#8217;ve made a joke about it<br />
in the beginning<br />
&#8220;glad you decided to make it, john&#8221;<br />
something like that<br />
tbone pikkens: yeah<br />
that would have ruled<br />
10:30 PM E-dawg: finally<br />
Obama is talking about the US standing in teh world<br />
but of course<br />
RZA: BUT MCCAIN VOTED FOR TORTURE!!!!<br />
E-dawg: he interrupts it by giving credit to McC<br />
where credit isn&#8217;t deserved<br />
see<br />
the mythology is so powerful<br />
RZA: is this two hours?<br />
yeah<br />
10:31 PM E-dawg: god I hope not<br />
RZA: independtes<br />
E-dawg: thirty more minutes of bloodletting<br />
RZA: dropping on ccnn<br />
dood<br />
tbone pikkens: i think obama needs to say<br />
RZA: indies hate this<br />
tbone pikkens: he is needed in dc<br />
and should run off stage<br />
RZA: word<br />
tbone pikkens: or challenge mcbrain to an arm wrestling contest<br />
E-dawg: lol<br />
10:32 PM nice<br />
RZA: lol<br />
tbone pikkens: &#8220;LET&#8217;S WRESTLE FOR IT!&#8221;<br />
RZA: or play a game of horse<br />
tbone pikkens: lol<br />
E-dawg: what the hell<br />
RZA: LATIN AMERICA!!!<br />
tbone pikkens: SI!<br />
E-dawg: China is investing in African mining<br />
RZA: any evo morales mention today?<br />
10:33 PM tbone pikkens: no todavia<br />
E-dawg: let&#8217;s pull the troops out of Iraq<br />
so we can put them in Zambia<br />
and throw those Chinese mining experts out<br />
this is frustrating<br />
as I expected<br />
tbone pikkens: they are not talking about anything that matters<br />
RZA: obama was doing good there htough<br />
tbone pikkens: that is why they should arm wrestle<br />
RZA: nothingness rules<br />
10:34 PM E-dawg: well<br />
RZA: BRING UP PALIN<br />
tbone pikkens: BOOM!<br />
RZA: experience<br />
PALIN<br />
mention paln<br />
E-dawg: he won&#8217;t<br />
RZA: palin<br />
tbone pikkens: CRUSHING<br />
E-dawg: doesn&#8217;t want to get uppity<br />
RZA: SURGE SURGE SURGE ALL THE TIME 24 HOURS SURGE<br />
10:35 PM tbone pikkens: i surged<br />
last week<br />
it was great<br />
E-dawg: peace?!<br />
ok&#8230;<br />
now&#8217;s the time&#8230;<br />
if he&#8217;s ever going to say Palin<br />
tbone pikkens: he should<br />
i agree<br />
E-dawg: nope<br />
RZA: KENYA DIG IT?!?!?!?!<br />
E-dawg: now they&#8217;re just making speeches<br />
10:36 PM inspirational bs<br />
tbone pikkens: was he tupac?<br />
E-dawg: just going on Foreign Policy<br />
even I would vote for McC<br />
RZA: PRISON?!?!?<br />
E-dawg: might as well have the real deal imperialist<br />
RZA: he&#8217;s a felon!!1<br />
10:37 PM E-dawg: thank god&#8230;<br />
it&#8217;s over<br />
tbone pikkens: vp debate<br />
E-dawg: might as well have the real deal than a weak-tea apoligst<br />
tbone pikkens: LOL<br />
E-dawg: apoligist<br />
tbone pikkens: LOL<br />
vp debate<br />
E-dawg: yeah&#8230;<br />
tbone pikkens: that will be a joke<br />
RZA: good job john?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nanothoughts.net/2008/09/27/first-presidential-debate-2008-lehrermccainobama-live-chatblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
